John Podhoretz plays Dr. Frankenstein and builds a candidate for president in 2008. "Let me build the perfect 2008 Republican candidate for you," he says in today's New York Post (Our comments in red):
1. He would be a governor because recent history demonstrates the nearly insuperable advantage governors have when it comes to running for president -- We agree wholeheartedly. Nominating a Senator is insanity.
2. He would be from a populous state, because his success there statewide might win him 10% of the of the Electoral College votes he would need on Election Day--We agree, sort of. While it would obviously be a tremendous advantage for any presidential candidate to wrap up 10% of the 270 Electoral College votes needed from his or her own state, it is by no means required. Neither Carter (GA) nor Clinton (AR) came from large states.
3. He would have to be acceptable to social conservatives with resolute stands on social issues like abortion because the Bush victory in 2004 demonstrated the importance of being able to bring evangelical churchgoers to the polls. But in manner and style he should be easygoing, in order to undercut the ability of Democrats and the MSM to paint him as an extremist -- Again, we agree wholeheartedly.
4. He should have particular appeal to Hispanics, because the Bush 2004 victory was built in part on pulling Hispanic voters away from the Democratic Party -- This is true, but we would argue that much of the Hispanic population's preference for Bush in 2004 was based upon similar conservative views, rather than Bush manufacturing some "particular" appeal. Hispanic families tend to be strong Catholics with conservative values.
5. He should have Southern credentials, because the GOP has to be able to rely on the votes of the solid South to prevail in the Electoral College --Again, we agree completely. Keeping the South together is an absolute must for the GOP (and breaking it up is a must for the Democrats).
These are the five measures of the perfect GOP candidate for 2008, according to Podhoretz.
We'll add an obvious sixth:
6. In order to win, he must actually run --Podhoretz was attempting to build a scenario in which only Jeb Bush could be considered the perfect candidate. Unfortunately, Jeb has all but taken an oath that he is not running.
Despite this, we believe most of Podhoretz' measures of "the perfect candidate" hold true for any GOP candidate in 2008. Let's see how Mike Huckabee measures up.
1. He would be a governor --Mike Huckabee is a governor (AR), currently one of the longest-serving and most successful governors in the nation and incoming Chairman of the National Governor's Association.
2. He would be from a populous state --Arkansas, with only 6 electoral votes, certainly does not qualify as a populous state, but we've established that isn't necessarily required in order to be successful.
3. He would have to be acceptable to social conservatives with resolute stands on social issues like abortion, but "easy-going" in manner and style --We can think of few sentences that better describe Mike Huckabee, a former Southern Baptist preacher and compassionate conservative.
4. He should have particular appeal to Hispanics --We've already established that we believe Republicans' conservative family values are enough to appeal to Hispanic families, but if more is needed, Gov. Mike Huckabee has taken very public stands on advocating vital services be made available to the children of illegal immigrants including prenatal care and college scholarships. Huckabee has demonstrated leadership by taking these stands despite their unpopularity among some conservatives because: a) he believes every child deserves a chance to be born healthy, and b) he believes children should not be punished for the crimes of their parents.
5. He should have Southern credentials, because the GOP has to be able to rely on the "solid South" to prevail in the Electoral College --Absolutely true. In fact, recent presidential campaign history proves that while being from a populous state is NOT required, being able to win the South IS required. In other words, risking one or two Southern states in order to shore up support in a larger state would be extremely foolish for the GOP and would likely result in losing the election. Not only that, but it would be tantamount to throwing the Democrats a life preserver in a region they desperately need to recover. Who better than Mike Huckabee, a born and bred Southern Governor, former Baptist minister, and truly compassionate conservative to carry the South and bridge the gap between evangelicals and moderates? By the way, the "solid South" equates to 64 electoral votes, almost one quarter of the total needed to win.
BSR
Special thanks to Ryan James for posting the Podhoretz article.















